Details

Determination of Total and Temporary Hardness in Waters of Differing Origin and Treatment by EDTA Complexometric Titration: Implications for Soil and Agricultural Water Use

Aanya Shah

Vadodara, Gujarat

7-21

Vol: 16, Issue: 4, 2026

Receiving Date: 2026-08-12 Acceptance Date:

2026-09-19

Publication Date:

2026-10-14

Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrst.v16i04.002

Abstract

Water hardness, the combined concentration of dissolved calcium and magnesium ions, affects drinking-water taste, soap performance, and the formation of scale in heating equipment. In this study, total hardness was determined by direct complexometric titration with 0.01 M disodium EDTA at pH 10, using Eriochrome Black T (EBT) as the indicator. Six water types were analysed: distilled water, rain water, reverse-osmosis (RO) water, household drinking water, commercial bottled drinking water, and boiled tap water. Each 100 mL sample was buffered, indicated, and titrated to the pink-to-violet-blue endpoint, giving a direct conversion of 0.1 mL EDTA to 1 ppm as CaCO₃. Total hardness ranged from 1.2 ppm (lowest sample) to 142 ppm (highest sample). Comparing boiled and unboiled tap water gave a temporary hardness of 78 ppm (54.9% of total). All six samples were below the BIS acceptable limit of 200 mg/L. The results show that water source and treatment (distillation or RO versus mineral-bearing supplied water) have the strongest influence on hardness, and that the method is a low-cost, reliable way to screen water quality with basic school or college laboratory equipment. Because Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ also control irrigation-water quality, soil structure and the performance of sprayed agrochemicals, the results are converted to meq/L and interpreted for agricultural use, as a water-side companion. Hardness alone cannot establish irrigation suitability, which also requires sodium, bicarbonate and salinity data; the study therefore frames, rather than answers, the question of whether the hardness of the water used to prepare and apply fertilisers affects their performance.

References

  1. Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., & Eaton, A.D. (Eds.). (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Method 2340 C: Hardness by EDTA titrimetric method.
  2. World Health Organization. (2011). Hardness in Drinking-water: Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Geneva: WHO
  3. Harris, D.C., & Lucy, C.A. (2020). Quantitative Chemical Analysis (10th ed.). W.H. Freeman. Chapter on EDTA titrations.
  4. Skoog, D.A., West, D.M., Holler, F.J., & Crouch, S.R. (2014). Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. Chapter on complexation titrations.
  5. Schwarzenbach, G., & Flaschka, H. (1969). Complexometric Titrations (2nd English ed.). Methuen, London.
  6. Briggs, J.C., & Ficke, J.F. (1977). Quality of Rivers of the United States, 1975 Water Year. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-200. (Source of the commonly cited hardness classification.)
  7. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2012). IS 10500:2012 Drinking Water — Specification (Second revision). New Delhi: BIS.
  8. Shah, M.C., Shilpkar, P.G., & Acharya, P.B. (2008). Ground water quality of Gandhinagar Taluka, Gujarat, India. E-Journal of Chemistry, 5(3), 435–446.
  9. Ghani, A., Qayyum, I., Hussain, S., Riaz, M., & Saddiqa, A. (2019). Evaluation of hardness of ground drinking water in Vehari, Pakistan. International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology, 10(4), 84–89.
  10. Ayers, R.S., & Westcot, D.W. (1985). Water Quality for Agriculture (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, Rev. 1). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  11. Richards, L.A. (Ed.). (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils (USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 60). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  12. Nakayama, F.S., & Bucks, D.A. (1991). Water quality in drip/trickle irrigation: a review. Irrigation Science, 12(4), 187–192.
  13. Thelen, K.D., Jackson, E.P., & Penner, D. (1995). The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Science, 43(4), 541–548.
  14. Choudhary, R.C., Bairwa, H.L., Kumar, U., Javed, T., Asad, M., Lal, K., Mahawer, L.N., Sharma, S.K., Singh, P., Hassan, M.M., Abo-Shosha, A.A., Rajagopal, R., & Abdelsalam, N.R. (2022). Influence of organic manures on soil nutrient content, microbial population, yield and quality parameters of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. PLoS ONE, 17(4).
  15. Mukherjee, S., Gupta, A., Nandi, R., Chakraborty, A., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2025). Exploring the microbial community dynamics of Jeevamrit reveals the multifaceted roles of the Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera in nutrient availability and plant growth promotion in India’s Zero Budget Natural Farming. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Research in Science and Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.