Smart Learning App For Coding
Anikait Kapoor
Apex Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Engineering Department Chandigarh University
Debavushan Saikia
Apex Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Engineering Department Chandigarh University
Prabhgun Kaur Khurana
Apex Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Engineering Department Chandigarh University
Ishaan Dhawan
Apex Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Engineering Department Chandigarh University
7-18
Vol: 15, Issue: 2, 2025
Receiving Date:
2025-03-01
Acceptance Date:
2025-05-02
Publication Date:
2025-05-15
Download PDF
http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrst.v15i02.002
Abstract
With smart learning apps for encryption, progressive development of programming documents includes lessons in the field of programming documents. False Comfortable standard methods such as MOO and special data requirements, combining processes such as Intelligence (AI), code organization, and flexible learning frames. This is a high consideration for explaining the process and explaining the problem to solve the problem, and a discussion to criticize reality and AI proposals. This overview of various cases relating to how this experienced learning application is related to the obligation to create newborn lessons and progressive applications. In fact, issues like information security and content coordination should always be kept intelligent. The company shows that these devices are undoubtedly taking part in normalizing encryption times, allowing the second professional to take innovative steps in the progressive future.
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Personalized Learning Paths; Natural Language Processing; Predictive Analytics; Gamification; Virtual Coding Assistants; Simulated Interviews
References
- ALFarsi, G. M., Tawafak, R. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2024). Systematic literature review for smart learning in programming courses. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(12), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i12.46299
- Anonymous. (2025). Gamified e-learning in programming education: A review of research on engagement and learning. In Innovative solutions: A systematic approach towards sustainable future (1st ed., pp. 216– 228). https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-49238-47-3/CH22
- Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking skills using educational programming tools. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
- Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240– 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.006
- Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by design and development of interactive storytelling environments: The case of Scratch programming environment in primary education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 59–69.
- Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
- Grover, S., Cooper, S., & Pea, R. (2014). Assessing computational learning in K–12: Integrating computer science and computational thinking into school curricula. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708
- Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via Scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33–50.
- Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2023). Educational mobile apps for programming in Python: Review and analysis. Education Sciences, 13(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010066
- Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K–12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51– 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
- Maher, D., Elsayed, A., & Elnaggar, M. (2025). The effectiveness of a newly developed smart learning environment for developing Smart Devices Apps Design Skills. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 26, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v26i.12392
- Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). The impact of coding apps to support young children in computational thinking and computational fluency: A literature review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 657895. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.657895
- Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Developing computational thinking skills in early childhood education with the use of a programmable robot: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2777–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9543-1
- Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
- Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Back
